TY - GEN
T1 - Digital forensic evidence collection of cloud storage data for investigation
AU - Easwaramoorthy, Sathishkumar
AU - Thamburasa, Sankar
AU - Samy, Guru
AU - Bhushan, S. Bharath
AU - Aravind, Karrothu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/9/15
Y1 - 2016/9/15
N2 - In recent days Cloud services such as storage is more familiar to business and Individuals. This storage services are found as a problem to examiners and researchers in the field of forensics. There are many kind of storage services available in cloud and every service face a diverse issues in illegitimate action. The evidence identification, preservation, and collection are hard when dissimilar services are utilized by offenders. Lack of knowledge regarding location of evidence data can also affect investigation and it take more time to meet every cloud storage providers to decide where the evidence is saved within their infrastructure. In this study two popular public cloud service providers (Microsoft One Drive and Amazon cloud drive) are used to perform forensics evidence collection procedure through browser and service providers software on a Windows 7 computer. By identifying the evidence data on a client device, provide a clear idea about type of evidences are exist in machine for forensics practitioners. Possible evidence determined throughout this study include file timestamps, file hashes, client software log files, memory captures, link files and other evidences are also obtainable to different cloud service providers.
AB - In recent days Cloud services such as storage is more familiar to business and Individuals. This storage services are found as a problem to examiners and researchers in the field of forensics. There are many kind of storage services available in cloud and every service face a diverse issues in illegitimate action. The evidence identification, preservation, and collection are hard when dissimilar services are utilized by offenders. Lack of knowledge regarding location of evidence data can also affect investigation and it take more time to meet every cloud storage providers to decide where the evidence is saved within their infrastructure. In this study two popular public cloud service providers (Microsoft One Drive and Amazon cloud drive) are used to perform forensics evidence collection procedure through browser and service providers software on a Windows 7 computer. By identifying the evidence data on a client device, provide a clear idea about type of evidences are exist in machine for forensics practitioners. Possible evidence determined throughout this study include file timestamps, file hashes, client software log files, memory captures, link files and other evidences are also obtainable to different cloud service providers.
KW - Amazon cloud Drive
KW - Digital forensics
KW - Microsoft One Drive
KW - Windows 7
KW - client software
KW - web browser
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84991769552
U2 - 10.1109/ICRTIT.2016.7569516
DO - 10.1109/ICRTIT.2016.7569516
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84991769552
T3 - 2016 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, ICRTIT 2016
BT - 2016 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, ICRTIT 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, ICRTIT 2016
Y2 - 8 April 2016 through 9 April 2016
ER -