Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Construct validity of the mclean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder in two singaporean samples

  • Shian Ling Keng
  • , Yirong Lee
  • , Sukriti Drabu
  • , Ryan Y. Hong
  • , Cornelia Y.I. Chee
  • , Cyrus S.H. Ho
  • , Roger C.M. Ho
  • Yale-NUS College
  • Ministry of Social and Family Development
  • National University of Singapore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the construct validity of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD) in a consecutive sample of adult psychiatric patients (n = 128) and a separate sample of undergraduate students (n = 289) in Singapore. Participants were administered the MSI-BPD and other measures assessing related symptoms of BPD. Patients were also administered a semistructured interview by interviewers blind to their MSI-BPD scores. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a unique three-factor solution, consisting of affect dysregulation, self-disturbances, and behavioral and interpersonal dysregulation. In both samples, the MSI-BPD demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity. The measure also showed good discriminant validity and predictive accuracy (AUC =.82), with an optimal cut-off score of 7.5. Overall, the findings suggest that BPD is a valid and coherent clinical construct in Singapore, and point to the need to further clarify the presentation and etiology of BPD in this cultural context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)450-469
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Personality Disorders
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Borderline personality disorder
  • Construct validity
  • Factorial validity
  • Singapore

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construct validity of the mclean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder in two singaporean samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this