Abstract
This study examined the construct validity of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD) in a consecutive sample of adult psychiatric patients (n = 128) and a separate sample of undergraduate students (n = 289) in Singapore. Participants were administered the MSI-BPD and other measures assessing related symptoms of BPD. Patients were also administered a semistructured interview by interviewers blind to their MSI-BPD scores. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a unique three-factor solution, consisting of affect dysregulation, self-disturbances, and behavioral and interpersonal dysregulation. In both samples, the MSI-BPD demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity. The measure also showed good discriminant validity and predictive accuracy (AUC =.82), with an optimal cut-off score of 7.5. Overall, the findings suggest that BPD is a valid and coherent clinical construct in Singapore, and point to the need to further clarify the presentation and etiology of BPD in this cultural context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 450-469 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality Disorders |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Assessment
- Borderline personality disorder
- Construct validity
- Factorial validity
- Singapore
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Construct validity of the mclean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder in two singaporean samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver